I took the tact of going through the article and picking up items and responding to it, so you could get a feel for what a reader would see.

There are a few topics for which a long and lengthy conversation could be had, but the free form would be great at a bar over pints or shots or martinis or coffee.

My view on the nuclear topic is if the intent of the person is negative and to end it, then the guy is being fragile. The question comes down to having a long enough conversation to detect it and avoiding stereotypes around it.

Greta's words and message she wants to see isn't bad, just there are pretty severe consequences where a lot of or's will have to be dealt with. If people are defensive and an environment where folks shame on gender occurs, nothing will be fixed.

Words matter greatly and any bias undealt with now given a more equal standing on all parties will have large implications

Lover of people, Texas Feminist Liberal Democrat, Horse Farm, High Tech Gadget ENFP Guy, and someone who appreciates the struggle of women and wants to help.

Lover of people, Texas Feminist Liberal Democrat, Horse Farm, High Tech Gadget ENFP Guy, and someone who appreciates the struggle of women and wants to help.