I worked on unpacking my natural switch view on sex and what not.

Per traditional views, I attain what tradition says is perfect. I am the primary bread winner, and am required to make the decisions (though I always share decisions and work through and with my partner [feminism you know]).

But frankly, it gets tiresome being the lead and also doing what is needed for the relationship (i.e. she cooks, I do laundry, dishes, clean, and most of the time do the shopping, garbage etc).

I chuckle when I see the articles because I know there true but I get it ... if guys want more sex, do more in the relationship household (actively not passively).

Why do I chuckle? By the time you are done with all of that "you won't have the energy or drive", so sex won't happen.

So take a non-feminist, non-religious woman who is "extremely" traditional on views that men "always" drive desire, and women accept (your article).

I find I can understand the perspective that you state (parts of it but not all of it since I am a man).

I do love the irony ... lots of studies on male orgasm but scant on male birth control. Yet vice versa for women ....

Sex education in the USA is laughable, and frankly still puriticanal as you so very much document.

Maybe one fun thing is maybe laws should be created (you know save the babies) that if a man gives a woman an STD or impregnantes and is not accountable ... he get snipped. Repeate offenders could be sterlized ...

Then maybe with consequence, men could learn to be accountable and learn to keep their legs closed.

But in the end .... the old fashioned rules still stay put ... I have the pussy I make the rules vs the real issue in our society ... I am an available masculine person willing to love with an open heart and be vulnerable or honest ... or in short ... I have a masculine empathic heart I give the love and desire ... dunno